Setting the Right Expectations
Redesigning the 'Expectations Setting' page to minimize account opening drop-off
- [ Company ]
- Capital One
- [ Role ]
- Design Lead
Research Lead - [ Partners ]
- 1x Product Owner
- [ Timeframe ]
- 2024 — Present
Overview
Through a data-driven, research-heavy process, I designed and delivered a new 'Expectations Setting' page to address a concerning level of user drop-off at the start of Capital One's account opening funnel.
Fig 1.1 —
Preview
Fig 1.2 —
Executive Summary
Of all pages within the account opening application, the highest drop-off rate (~33%) was on the 'Expectations Settings' page.
In a large research initiative, I uncovered the exact expectations users found important to know for account opening.
The insights from research informed a redesign of the 'Expectations Settings' page that reduced drop-off by delivering the right information.
Context
When users apply for a Capital One bank account online, the 'Expectations Setting' page is their first point of contact.
About the Page
New applicants can feel anxious about the process of opening a bank account, unsure of what to expect or what's required of them. The 'Expectations Setting' page is intended to serve as a soft transition into the application for users, helping them understand the process and feel more comfortable before proceeding.
Fig 2.1 —
Current State Design
Fig 2.2 —
Account Opening Flow
Problem
The 'Expectations Setting' page was experiencing unusually high drop-off rates.
The Drop-Off Mystery
We noticed unexpected behavior on the 'Expectations Setting' page: many users were abandoning the application at this first step, despite already having expressed interest in the account.
Fig 3.1 —
User Journey
Business Impacts
The drop-off on the 'Expectations Setting' page accounts for over a third of the total drop-off in the account opening flow, resulting in an annual loss of 400,000 potential customers from this one page alone. This is especially concerning, as each lost customer represents not only an immediate missed opportunity but also a significant negative impact on downstream business metrics.
Fig 3.2 —
Application Drop-Off Waterfall
An Early Signal
Prior research suggested that the content of the 'Expectations Setting' page did not resonate with users, potentially driving the high drop-off rate. In order to validate this, a deeper investigation was needed.
Fig 3.3 —
User Feedback
Research
A large card sort study with 120 participants revealed user preference for clear, concise, and immediately relevant expectations content.
Research Method
To evaluate the content on the 'Expectations Setting' page, we conducted a card sort study. By asking participants to sort different expectations content by its importance, we could better understand what matters most to users and use that insight to redesign the 'Expectations Setting' page.
Fig 4.1 —
Card Sorting
Segmentation Strategy
We recruited 120 participants of diverse ages and financial backgrounds to ensure our findings captured a wide range of user needs. These participants were split into groups to test two key hypotheses we had about how certain user characteristics could influence what information they prioritized.
Fig 4.2 —
Hypotheses
Customer Type
We believe users' prior experience with Capital One ( New to Capital One, Existing Credit Card Customer, Existing Bank Account Customer) affects their familiarity with the bank's processes, and therefore what information they find important.
Account Type
We believe users have different mental models for different account types ( checking account, savings account), and therefore prioritize different information depending on the account being opened.
Fig 4.3 —
Participant Groups
Generating Relevant Cards
To cover our blindspots, it was important for us to evaluate not only the expectations content we already had, but a comprehensive range of other expectations content as well. By conducting a competitive analysis of other 'Expectations Setting' pages, we were able to generate a list of 22 cards for participants to sort.
Fig 4.4 —
Card Generation Procedure
Fig 4.5 —
Final List of Cards
Study Setup
Generally, users apply for an account after exploring a 'Product Details' page on our website. To strengthen the validity of our results, we designed our study to closely replicate this user journey, allowing participants to mirror the head space of real customers.
Fig 4.6 —
Participant Procedure
Explore
Participants first explored a 'Product Details' page for their assigned account type. This gave participants foundational context about the account.
Key Findings
The card sort results revealed clear patterns in user preferences, offering insight into what types of expectations content were most and least valuable:
Fig 4.7 —
Card Sort Results
Revisiting Our Hypotheses
Reflecting on our participant segmentation, we found very few meaningful differences between the segments, suggesting limited support for our initial hypotheses. This finding implies that a one-size-fits-all approach may be more suitable than initially expected, reducing the need for highly tailored expectations based on segment differences.
Fig 4.8 —
Hypotheses
Customer Type
Rejected
The data did not indicate that users of different customer types ( New to Capital One, Existing Credit Card Customer, Existing Bank Account Customer) prioritized expectations differently.
Account Type
Rejected
The data did not indicate that users of different account types ( checking account, savings account) prioritized expectations differently.
Design
Guided by our research results, we redesigned the 'Expectation Setting' page with a focus on the information users found most valuable.
Redesign Framework
We laid a foundation for the redesign by translating our card sort findings into 4 actionable recommendations.
Fig 5.1 —
Design Recommendations
Display critical information prominently.
Highlight security-related information, and information about what to have prepared.
Maintain visibility of important information.
Clarify the steps involved in the application process. Reiterate key product benefits.
Reconsider the placement of supplementary information.
Move helpful, but niche details to later stages in the application flow to reduce distractions during the initial steps.
Remove irrelevant and obvious information.
Eliminate unhelpful content to reduce cognitive load and maintain focus on more important information.
Fig 5.2 —
Card Mapping
Destination State
We envisioned a long-term destination state for the 'Expectations Setting' page that is unconstrained by the limitations of the existing application design.
Fig 5.3 —
Destination State Design
Fig 5.4 —
Highlights
Optimized Page Layout
We reclaimed dead space, allowing us to fit all the necessary information without it feeling cluttered or overwhelming.
Prominent 'Critical' Content
We placed all critical information in the main action container to ensure it is highly visible.
Persistent Progress Tracking
We introduced a persistent side panel with a progress bar to help users navigate the process.
MVP State
To bridge the gap to the long-term destination state, we developed an MVP to address immediate needs while preparing for the larger redesign.
Fig 5.5 —
MVP Design
Fig 5.6 —
Highlights
Retains Existing Layout
To minimize the development scope, we needed to work within the smaller footprint of the existing application layout, requiring careful prioritization of what content to include.
Impact
As of writing, this project is still ongoing. At scale, we expect to make a sizable reduction in the addressable drop-off.
Implementation Plan
We are taking a parallel approach to release, with two main tracks running simultaneously.
Fig 6.1 —
Release Tracks
MVP
Rapidly develop the MVP in order to start making an impact to customers. Conduct an A/B test in production and monitor performance closely to make data-driven adjustments.
Destination State
Simultaneously, conduct user testing on the destination state, iterating based on feedback. Prepare for a synchronized launch with the larger Capital One brand refresh for a cohesive user experience across all products.
Expected Impact
The redesign is forecasted to reduce the relative drop-off rate of the 'Expectations Setting' page by 6 to 14 percentage points, yielding a $2.25M to $5.25M incremental present value (PV) per month.
Fig 6.2 —